CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
The Sugar Industry of Cuba Institute, Inc.

Cordially requests your presence at its Sixth Annual Conference entitled:

"POST-CASTRO CUBA: THE CHALLENGE OF THE 21ST CENTURY"
The role of agribusiness in re-establishing social, political, economic and human rights
after more than four decades of degradation.


April 28th, 2001
Hotel Sofitel
5800 Blue Lagoon Drive
Miami, Florida 33126

WWW.CUBANSUGAR.COM

CONFERENCE PROGRAM

I. 7:00 - 8:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast Reception and Registration


II. 8:00 - 8:30 a.m. Welcome & Introduction
Dr. Alberto J. Beguiristaín, President,
National Association of Sugar Mill Owners of Cuba &
Caribbean Development Research Institute

Moderator
Nicolás J. Gutiérrez, Jr., Esq., Secretary,
National Association of Sugar Mill Owners of Cuba &
Caribbean Development Research Institute


III. 8:30 - 9:10 a.m. Sugar Industry Mission Statement by Sector
A. National Association of Sugar Cane Growers of Cuba - (20 min)

B. National Federation of Sugar Workers of Cuba - (20 min.)
9:10 - 9:30 a.m. Cattle Industry Mission Statement
A. National Association of Cattlemen of Cuba (20 min,)

IV. 9:30 - 10:30 a.m. Restitution of Property - Real World Examples

A. Ivan Pilip, Chairman of the Banking Commission, Chamber of Deputies, Parliament of the Czech Republic, The Czechoslovakian Experience - (15 min.)

B. The Nicaraguan Experience - (15 min.)

C. The East German/Baltic Republics Experience - (15 min.)

D. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)

10:30 - 10:45 a.m. Coffee Break

V. 10:45 - 12:15 p.m. Economics and Investment Issues

A. Amb. Otto J. Reich, Former U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela - (15 min.)

B. Hon. Antonio J. Villamil, President, U.S. - Cuba Business Council - (15 min.)

C. Hon. Charles Shapiro, Director, Office of Cuban Affairs, U.S. Department of State - (15 min.)

D. Amb. Dennis Hays, Washington Director, Cuban-American National Foundation - (15 min.)

E. Ralph J. Galliano, Editor, U.S. * Cuba Policy Report and Director, Caribbean Development Research Institute, " Implications of Cuba's Inclusion in U.S. Tariff Rate Quota"- (15 min.)

F. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)


VI. 12:15 - 12:30 p.m. Cocktail Reception - Courtesy of Bacardí-Martini (U.S.A.), Inc.

VII. 12:30 -2:00 p.m. Lunch

Luncheon Speakers: Hon. Mel Martínez, Secretary, Housing & Urban Development - (invited)

Hon. Jeb Bush, Governor, State of Florida - (invited)

(including Questions and Answers)


VIII. 2:00-3:00 p.m. Agricultural Sector Panel

A. Diego Suárez, Jr., President, Inter-American Transport Equipment Co.Ltd. - (15 min.)
B. Steven Clarke, Director of Industrial Research of Okeelanta Sugar Co., and Florida Crystals, Inc. - (15 min.)

C. Kelly Tractor Co., "Career Opportunities as a Caterpillar Service Technician- Think Big about the Future" - (15 min.)
D. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)

IX. 3:00 - 3:45 p.m. Industry Sector Panel

A. John A. Fanjul, President, Atlantic Sugar Association, and Director, National Association of Sugar Mill Owners of Cuba , "A Manager's Challenge: How to Motivate the Labor Force to Improve Actual Performance" - (15 min.)

B. Pablo A. Carreño, Director, National Association of Sugar Mill Owners of Cuba (ANDHAC),"The ANDHAC in the Sugar Industry of a free Cuba"-(15 min.)
C. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)

X. 3:45 - 4:45 p.m. Marketing: The World Sugar Market in the Next Decade

A. Arturo Sterling, Former Officer, Czarnikow Ríonda - (15 min.)

B. Jonathan Kingsman, Consultant, NMS Rothschild Group - (15 min.)

C. Port of Palm Beach - (15 min.)
D. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)

XI. 4:45 - 5:45 p.m. The Human Rights Situation inside of Cuba

A. Frank A. Calzón, Director, Center for a Free Cuba - (invited)- (15 min.)

B. Evelio Ancheta, Director, Partido de los Derechos Humanos de Cuba - (15 min.)

C. José Collado -Director, Caribbean Development Research Institute & Vice-.President of the Carpenter's Brotherhood, AFL-CIO- (15 min.)

D. Questions and Answers - (15 min.)

XII. 5:45 - 6:00 p.m. Conclusion of Conference-

XIII. 6:00- 7:30 p.m. Cocktail Reception- Courtesy of Bacardí-Martini (U.S.A.), Inc.

. REGISTRATION INFORMATION


Contribution:
Due to limited space, we urge you to register early. The contribution for the Conference is $125.00 per person, including a lunch ticket and the Conference materials. Extra copies of the Conference material can be obtained at $75.00 each. Mail your request to Caribbean Development Research Institute, P.O. Box 145022, Coral Gables Florida 33114-5022. Members of sponsoring organizations may attend the conference at a special contribution of $50.00 per person. The Internal Revenue Service has approved the Caribbean Development Research Institute's 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization designation. Consequently, all donations made to the Institute are fully tax-deductible to the donor.
Cancellations:
The fee is refundable only through a written notification, which must be received at P.O. Box 145022 Coral Gables, Florida 33114-5022 or at the facsimile no. 305-373-2735, by April 20th, 2001.
Accommodations:
A discount-lodging rate is available at the Hotel Sofitel, 5800 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, Florida. For more information: Telephone No. (305) 264-4888; Facsimile No. (305) 261-7871
………………………………………………………………………………………..
REGISTRATION:
Caribbean Development Research Institute, Inc,
P.O. Box 145022
Coral Gables, Florida 33114-5022 E-Mail: BEGUIRISTAIN@ CS. COM
Faxes: (305)-595-2294, (305)-373-2735


FIRST NAME MIDLE NAME LAST NAME


TITLE-----------------------------------------------------ORGANIZATION:------------------------------------------------

STREET ADRESS------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CITY-----------------------------STATE -----------------------------------------------ZIP CODE----------------------------

TELEPHONE--------------------------------------------------FAX------------------------------------E-MAIL-----------------------------------


AMOUNT ENCLOSED $125.00 per person-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ADDITIONAL BINDERS OF CONFERENCE MATERIALS, AT $75.00 EACH:=--------------------------------TOTAL


NOTICE
TO ALL INVESTORS IN CUBA

CASTRO REGIME IS INVITING INVESTORS TO CUBA AND OFFERING FOR SALE
NUMEROUS AND DIVERSE ECONOMIC ASSETS
These assets or properties are a product of the confiscation without compensation (theft)
Perpetrated by this regime through the use of force

DANGER

As soon as the Republic of Cuba reinstates the rule of law, the legitimate owners of
These properties shall exercise their right to recover them, to the explicit detriment
of the current acquirors of these properties.


GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY

A Choice for Human Rights
Donald J. Trump is a real-estate investor and head of The Trump Organization in New York City.

Several large European investment groups have asked me to take the "Trump Magic" to Cuba. They have "begged" me to form partnerships to build casino-hotels in Havana. With the influx of foreign tourists, we would make a fortune, they promise, and they are no doubt right. They are also right to say that this type of arrangement would allow me to skirt the U.S. imposed embargo.

But rushing to join those who would do business in Cuba would do more than that. It would place me directly at odds with the long-standing U.S. policy of isolating Fidel Castro. I had a choice to make: huge profits or human rights. For me, it was a no brainer.

I fully understand the familiar arguments for lifting the embargo, The Cold War is over. Castro is on the ropes. Pumping money into his economy would benefit the Long-suffering masses. This is the way to "open up" Cuba, export democracy, and promote entrepreneurship and independence for the state. We need to put the past behind us.

Each of those arguments is bogus.

The Cold War is indeed over, but it would be instructive to remember the role that Castro played in the struggle between -- yes -- good and evil. He turned his island over to his Soviet patrons. He was quite willing to have nuclear missiles, launched from Cuban soil, destroy American cities. He exported revolution to Central and South America. He abetted Libyan terrorism. He gave asylum to murderers. He posted troops in Africa.

More important, he turned his nation into a maximum-security prison. His regime controls every aspect of human life - access to food, medical assistance, schools and employment. Castro has not mellowed with age. Terror continues to reign. The secret police are unrestrained. The disappearance and beating of citizens are still tools of civilian control, as is the suppressions of free speech. Castro's ruthless domination of the Cuban people has not lessened even as his regime crumbles.

The real cause of misery of the Cuban people is Castro's Marxist-Leninist economic system - not the U.S. embargo. Castro's Cuba is a brutal police state; Castro rules through terror, intimidation and brutality.

Castro urgently wants the United States to lift the embargo because he is desperate for hard currency to keep his faltering communist economy afloat. Now, without the generous subsidies from the Soviet Union - between $5 - 7 billion dollars a year - Cuba's economy is reeling.

Of course, he would love Donald Trump to come to Havana and build casino hotels. Why? Not to raise the standard of living for the people of Cuba. Quite the contrary. Almost every dollar would go to prop up his police-state. Why? Because foreign investors cannot legally do business with private Cuban citizens. They can go into business only with the Castro government. It is highly illegal in Cuba for anyone except for the regimen to employs a Cuban citizen.

Foreign investors are not allowed to hire or pay Cuban workers. They must pay the government directly for the workers. Castro then pays the workers in worthless Cuban money and keeps the rest. Under these circumstances, my investment cannot help average Cubans - it can only replace the Soviet subsidy Castro no longer receives.

If I opened a casino/hotel in Havana, I would be required to pay Castro about $10,000 per year for each Cuban worker. But the workers would not benefit. Castro would pay them in the equivalent of $10 a month. The rest he uses to pay for the brutal and violent systems that keeps him in power - and deprives the Cuban people of basic human rights. In other words, my investment in Cuba would directly subsidize the oppression of the Cuban people.

Yes the embargo is costly. If I formed a joint venture with European partners. I would make millions of dollars. But I'd rather lose those millions than lose my self-respect. I would rather take a financial hit than become a financial backer of one of the world's most brutal dictators, a man who was once willing to aid in the destruction of my country. To me the embargo question is no question at all. Of course, we should keep the embargo in place. We should keep it until Castro is gone.

 

NO SUBSIDIARE LA OPRESION DEL PUEBLO DE CUBA
Por Donald J. Trump

Varios grupos de inversionistas europeos importantes me han pedido que lleve la "Magia Trump" a Cuba. Me han "rogado" que forme asociaciones para construir hoteles-casinos en La Habana. Con la afluencia de turistas extranjeros, me prometen que hariamos un fortuna, y no dudo que tengan razon. Tambien aciertan al decir que el tipo de arreglo que proponen me permitiria burlar el embargo impuesto por Estados Unidos.

Pero el unirme a quienes estan deseosos de hacer negocio en Cuba me colocaria a contrapelo de la politica de aislar a Fidel Castro, establecida por los Estados Unidos. Tenia dos opciones entre las cuales escoger: cuantiosas ganancias o derechos humanos. Para mi, la decision el clara.

Comprendo plenamente los ya conocidos argumentos que favorecen el levantamiento del embargo: "La Guerra Fria termino. Castro esta liquidado. Invertire en la economia cubana beneficiaria a las sufridas masas. Es una forma de 'abrir' a Cuba, exportar la democracia, y promover la libre empresa a independizar a los cubanos del estado. Necesitamos olvidarnos del pasado".

Cada unos de esos argumentos carece de seriedad.

En efecto, la Guerra Fria ha terminado, pero seria oportuno recordar el papel que Castro jugo en la lucha entre el bien y el mal. Le entrego la isla a sus amos sovieticos. Estaba mas que dispuesto a permitir que misiles nucleares fueran lanzados desde suelo cubano y destruyeran ciudades estadounidenses. Castro exporto su revolucion a Centro y Suramerica. Apoyo el terrorismo. Brindo asilo a asesinos. Envio tropas a Africa.

Mas aun, convirtio a su nacion en una prision de maxima seguridad. Su regimen controla cada aspecto de la vida humana: acceso a los alimentos, asistencia medica, escuelas y empleo. Castro no se ha vuelto mas inofensivo con la edad. El terror aun impera. La policia secreta actua impunemente. Las detenciones y golpizas de ciudadanos continuan siendo instrumentos para controlar a la poblacion, como tambien la supresion de la libertad de expresion. La despiadada dominacion de Castro sobre el pueblo cubano no ha disminiudo a medida que su regimen se desmorona.

La verdadera causa de la miseria del pueblo cubano es el sistema economico marxista-leninista de Castro no el embargo estadounidense. La Cuba de Castro es un brutal estado policial; Castro impera por medio del terror, la intimidacion y la brutalidad.

Castro desea con urgencia que los Estados Unidos levante el embargo porque necesita desesperadamente divisas fuertes para mantenera a flote su bancarrota economia comunista. Hoy, sin los generosos subsidios de la Union Sovietica (entra $5 y $7 billones de dolares anuales) la economia de Cuba esta en crisis.

Por supuesto, a Castro le encantara que Donald Trump fuera a La Habana y construyera hoteles casino. ¿Por que? No para mejorar el nivel de vida del pueblo de Cuba. Por el contrario. Casi todos los dolares irian a apuntalar su estado policial. ¿Por que? Porque los inversionistas exrtranjeros no pueden legalmente hacer negocio con los ciudadanos cubanos, solo con el gobierno castrista.

A los inversionistas extranjeros no se les permite contratar o pagar directamente a los trabajadores cubanos. Deben hacerlo unicamente a traves del gobierno. Castro entonces le paga a los trabajadores en inservible moneda cubana y confisca el resto. Bajo esta circunstancias, mi inversion no puede ayudar al cubano promedio , solo reemplazaria el subsidio sovietico que Castro ya no recibe.

Si yo abriera un hotel-casino en La Habana yo estaria obligada a pagarle a Castro unos $10,000 dolares al ano por cada trabajador cubano. Pero los trabajadores no se beneficiarian. Castro les pagaria el equivalente de $10 dolares al mes. El resto lo utiliza para mantener en el poder y que despoja al pueblo cuabana de sus derechos mas elementales. En otras palabras, mi inversion en Cuba serviria para subsidiar directamente la opresion del pueblo cubano.

Si! El embargo es costoso para los inversionistas estadounidenses. Si yo formara una sociedad inversora con socios europeos, ganaria millones de dolares. Pero prefiero perder esos millones que perder el respeto de mi mismo. Prefiero asumir una perdida financiera que convertirme en el respaldo financiero de uno de los dictadores mas brutales del mundo, un hombre que una vez estuvo dispuesto a particpar en la destruccion de mi pais. Para mi, no existen dudas en torno al embargo. Por supuesto que debemos mantener el embargo. Debemos mantenerlo hasta que Castro desaparezca.

Donald J. Trump, conocido empresario estadounidense de bienes raices y principal ejectivo de The Trump Organization con sede en la Cuidad de Nueva York , es un personalidad internacional cuyo prestigio y capacidad empresarial lo han convertido en una de las figuras mas influyentes del mundo financiero. En este articulo, originalmente publicado en The Miami Herald el pasado 25 de junio, explica que su apoyo al embargo es una postura moral a favor del pueblo cubano.

 

SOUTH FLORIDA FAMILY SPURS U.S. PROBE OF CUBA FIRM

Upon the request of a South Florida family, the U.S. government is investigating the business dealings in Cuba of Sol Melia SA, the largest hotel chain in the Spanish-speaking world.

The State Department last month notified Sol that a South Florida family has claimed ownership of land on which three of Sol's beachfront hotels are located in Cuba's Holguin province, according to the family's Miami lawyer, Nicolas Gutierrez. Sol manages 12 hotels in Cuba.

Under the United States' Helms-Burton law, companies that use property confiscated by the communist Cuban government are liable to be sued by U.S. citizens and companies that formerly owned the property. In July, President Clinton waived enforcement for six months.

At this stage, the U.S. government is only gathering information, a spokesman at Spain's foreign ministry said on Thursday.

The claim was filed by five members of the family that controlled the 100,000-acre Central Santa Lucia sugar plantation. The land had been in the same family since 1857, and includes beachfront land occupied by Sol's hotels, Gutierrez said.

The five family members left Cuba in the 1960's, fleeing Fidel Castro's revolution. Alfredo Sanchez, Antonio Latour, Fernando Arguelles and Victor Pedroso are U.S. Citizens and Gustavo de los Reyes is Venezuelan. Alfredo Sanchez lives in West Palm Beach, de los Reyes splits his time between Miami and Caracas and the other three live in Miami.

 

HAY GENTE SIN SENTIDO DEL HUMOR

Una familia cubana reclama los terrenos donde instalan tres de los hoteles de Sol Melia en la isla caribena.

Palma.- La familia Sanchez contra Sol Melia. Los propietarios de un plantacion de azucar de 100.000 acres en Holguin, Cuba, Sanchez Antonio Latour, Fernando Arguelles, Victor Pedroso, Gustavo de los Reyes y Alfredo Sanchez, han reclamado la propiedad de estas tierras perdidas con la revolucion cubana y en donde se enclavarian tres hoteles de Sol Melia, ha publicado The Miami Herald, el periodico mas prestigioso de Florida.

La reclamacion podria activar la aplicacion de la ley Helms Burton y generar un nuevo pulso entre la Administracion norteamericana y la comision Europea (CE).

Los cinco miembros de esta familia dejaron Cuba en 1960 y ahora viven en Miami y West Palm Beach (Florida), echando de menos las propiedades que conservaban desde cuando la Isla todavia formaba parte de Espana.

El departamento de Estado americano notifico formalmente el mes pasado la firma hotelera espanola, aunque la semana pasada un portavoz de la cadena lo negase, que se habia producido dicha reclamacion, pidiendo el govierno de los EEUU que compartiese cualquier informacion que clarificarse el estatus de la propiedad.

Si la compania no cumple con este requerimiento corren el riesgo de que los ejecutivos de Sol Melia, incluidos esposas e hijos, no puedan pisar suelo americano.

Compensaciones economicas

La semana pasada funcionarios americanos indicaron que se trata meramente de una peticion de informacion de Sol Melia y no una accion legal directa contra la cadena. Esperan, indica el Herald, que la cadena hotelera puede superar esta situacion mediante un acuerdo con la familia Sanchez.

"Pueden o bien ofrecernos un compesacion adecuada o perder los derechos de sus ejecutivos a visitar EEUU", afirmo Nicolas Gutierrez, el abogado de la familia que tuvo un importante papel en la redaccion de los que se conoce como ley Helms Burton.

Esta legislacion pretende penar extraterritorialmente las inversiones en Cuba que afecten a antiguas propiedades de ciudadanos americanos.

La accion contra Sol Melia se encuadra en la propia contiende que mantiene el partido Republicano en el Congreso y el presidente Bill Clinton.

El Presidente y la Comision Europa llegaron a un entente en 1997 para que la CE no denunciase a los EEUU ante la Organizacion Mundial del Comericio a cambio de la discrecionalidad por parte del presidente a la hora de aplicar dicha legislacion, autoridad que ahora los republicanos quieren negarle.

Se ha actuado contra tres firmas extranjeras - mejicana, israeli y canadiense - impidiendo la entrada en territorio EEUU a sus directivos, pero no contra alguna europea.

 

NEWS


Thursday October 7 10:10 AM ET

Polish Parliament Backs Return Of Seized Property

WARSAW (Reuters) - Poland's parliament gave initial approval Thursday to a long-delayed bill on returning property illegally
seized by the state before the fall of communism in 1989. The legislation, which the government has drafted as a compromise
between the demands of former owners and the financial abilities of the state, was sent by parliament's lower house to its committeesfor more scrutiny before final approval.

``It is good that for the first time since the end of communism there is a chance for the restitution of property..., but we hope that the final version of the law will be more fair for us,'' said Tadeusz Koss of the Real Estate Owners Union.

Former owners say that the government's proposal to offer them only 50 percent of the value of confiscated assets is unacceptable. ``We hope the committee discussion will bring a compromise,'' said Koss, declining to elaborate. The government has said that under the proposed bill nearly 70 billion zlotys ($17 billion) would be doled out.

The state treasury has said it cannot afford more because of the heavy burden of vital social reforms, such as the overhaul of thepension system.

The government program provides for returning actual property seized between 1939 and 1962 wherever possible, meaning that only state or municipal property can be handed back. New private owners will not lose their property.

Former owners who cannot receive their actual property back will be offered coupons to buy alternative state assets or units in an investment fund to which the government will allocate some shares of privatized firms.

The law will return property to owners who were Polish citizens at the time of confiscation, or to their heirs, regardless of their
current citizenship.

It would generally not apply to vast pre-World War Two estates, palaces of historic value or large industrial plants, but rather to houses, plots of land and small businesses.

The government says that the restitution law should boost foreign investment because it will end uncertainty over ownership of land and other real estate.

The law is being pushed through by the ruling center-right coalition of parties whose roots are in the pre-1989 opposition to communism. They say restitution is an act, though modest, of historic justice.

Parliament rejected proposals of the opposition ex-communist party to offer compensation of only up to 30,000 zlotys ($7,340) per person. It also dismissed another motion to hold a nationwide referendum on the issue.

The bill will need to clear the senate and be signed by President Aleksander Kwasniewski, who is politically aligned with the
ex-communists. ``But I am confident the president will sign the bill, because of fear of losing votes,'' said Koss.

 

 

EU enviara un ultimatum a la cadena Sol Melia
La cadena hotelera espanola, sin embargo anuncio que seguira operando en Cuba

El departamento de Estado enviara Proximamente una notificacion a la cadena hotelera espanola Sol Melia, en la que se le dara un plazo de 45 dias para abandonar Cuba o indeminizar a los demandantes, para evitar sanciones administrativas previstas en la ley Helms-Burton.

"El Departamento de Estado esta muy cerca de enviar la segunda carta a Sol Melia. Ya le enviarion la primera, que decia: 'Tenemos evidencias razonables de que estan traficando propiedad confiscada de norteamericanos'. La segunda dira: 'Hemos determinado que estan traficando'", dijo el abogado Nicholas Gutierrez.

Gutierrez, representante legal de la familia Sanchez Hill , explico que "cuando se emita la notificacion, Sol Melia tendra 45 dias para abandonar el pais o llegar a un arreglo con la familia; esto ultimo lo pueden hacer ahora, no tienen que esparar a la segunda carta ", dijo el abogado.

Segun Gutierrez, el comite de Relaciones Exterior del Senado esta presionando al Departamento de Estado para que agilice los tramites.

Senalo que las sanciones administrativas que el govierno norteamericano puede aplicarle a la cadena hotelera estan establecidas en el titulo IV de la Ley Helms-Burton, mediante el cual se puede negar las visas para entrar a Estatos Unidos a los socios y sus familiares y ejecutivos.

"Toda Espana debe saber que el gobierno espanol esta protegiendo a inversionistas espanoles que se estan aprovechando de propiedades confiscadas de otros espanoles y a descendientes de espanoles, como es el caso de mi cliente, y por lo tanto, no le debe sorprender a nadie esto",expreso.

El abogado tambien informo que se le enviara un carta a la empresa hotelera alemana LTI y otra a la canadiense Air Transat, "ambas que tambien estan en la propiedad de la familia Sanchez, en la provincia de Holguin, en Cuba.

"Ademas, estamos moviendonos en el Condado de Miami-Dade para que les nieguen los permisos de funcionar a la oficina turistica de Sol Melia en el centro de Miami, las operadoras de un hotel en Miami Beach y otro en Orlando", indico.

Ignorando el eventual ultimatum de Estados Unidos para abandonar sus negocios en Cuba, la cadena hotelera espanola Sol Melia anuncio el sabado, por su parte, que seguira operando en la isla caribena, respaldada por el Derecho Internacional.

Tambien, la empresa subrayo el apoyo de Espana y de la Union Europea (UE) ante todo intento norteamericano de aplicar en su contra la Ley Helms-Burton.

Fuentes del gobierno espanol se apresuraron a anunciar que si Estados Unidos aplica sanciones a la cadena, Espana denunciara el caso ante la Organizacion Mundial del Comercio (OMC).

Sol Melia tiene actualmente 12 hoteles en Cuba, administradores bajo el "regimen de gestion, y no el de propiedad", indicaron fuentes de la empresa.


Fuente de informacion: El Nuevo Miami Herald, Domingo 31 de Octubre de 1999